Movie Club Month #6: Le Cercle Rouge

Original Poster
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 17007
Jean-Pierre Melville's penultimate effort is unlike anything else I've ever seen. It's a genre film with the cadence and intelligence of an art house flick. It's the most confident, self-assured cops and robbers drama in existence, more than happy to allow the camera to tell the story and to luxuriate in extended character moments, some of which are striking for both how good they are and for the absence of any comparable moments in Hollywood genre fare. The movie is worth the price of admission ($3 on YouTube, you bums), if for no other reason than it gives us a half-hour sequence with no dialogue that is every bit as gripping and memorable as the best the genre has to offer.

So the movie is deeply impressive, but it's also fun. It's a glimpse into a world that didn't really exist, at least in the way that Melville has translated for us, but that's all the more transporting as a result. It's a world of French people in trench coats smoking cigarettes. It's a world of men whose heart rates never rise above 65 bpm, no matter the impossible danger staring them in the face. It's a world where European stoicism is king. It's... well, it's tr? cool, and I hope you guys like it as much as I do .
Jan 7, 2017 6:25 PM
0 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 12800
Jean, I am going to watch your movie.
Jan 7, 2017 10:27 PM
0 0
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 20267
The heist in this is one of my favourite scenes. I'll bust out my copy and give it a rewatch sometime this month.
Jan 8, 2017 12:20 AM
0 0
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 20267
RockThe heist in this is one of my favourite scenes. I'll bust out my copy and give it a rewatch sometime this month.

So yeah, this is still great. The only part I take some issue with are the animals in Yves Montand's dream sequence, which plays as much more tacky than anything else in the film. But I can see why Melville went with it, as it's an efficient way to establish his inner turmoil and his arc pays off quite nicely. The heist is still the highlight of the movie, but this time around I better appreciated the handling of the preparation scenes, with their subtle and precise visuals and minimal exposition. In terms of gangster iconography, I think Le Samourai is a bit more enjoyable (Alain Delon with a hat > Alain Delon without a hat), but I still really like how Melville defines his more melancholy visual world here.
Jan 22, 2017 11:57 PM
0 0
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10518
Jean likes Melville? Maybe he isn't as bad as everyone here seems to think. Except for that Glengarry Glen Ross shit, of course.

Rock, as usual, is on point.


Jan 23, 2017 1:10 AM
0 0
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 13552
I tried to watch this film but the subtitles were majorly effed up, they kept repeating over the current subtitles and then subtitles for dialogue that hadn't happened yet would appear on the screen.

I will say I was engaged immediately by the tone of the film, and intrigued by the Krishna verse that starts the movie.
Jan 30, 2017 4:40 AM
0 0
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19872
One of my favorite movies. Old review from 2010;

Le cercle rouge (1970, Melville)




Despite having viewed two of his other movies, Le samourai, and Le Doulos, I decided to discuss Melville's 1970 crime drama/gangster movie not only because I own it, but because its become a new favorite of mine. Despite being better than Le Doulos but not as good as Le samourai, it is still a great film, made in a similar vein. Only instead of one man living by a strict code of honor, its three men from different backgrounds brought together by the common goal of a grand heist. Say what you what you will about the men, but the film makes it rather clear that not only this is the life they've chosen, but forces beyond their control and society having already decided their lives results in them having no choice but to break the law.

If the thought of thieves and murders have a code of honor which they obey, and that no one else understands sounds familiar, then perhaps you are already thinking of John Woo's movies in the 80s and 90s. In fact, Woo wrote an essay for the film's Criterion release, and after reading it I further understand the movie's themes, and the impact it and other Melville works have had on Woo's career. Just like Meville I've only viewed three of Woo's movies, but The Killer and Hard Boiled both bear the same stamp that Le samourai, Le cercle rouge, and Le Doulos made on Woo's films. Although I think that Le Doulos is in some ways quite different from the other two Meville films. I wish I had more to go on concerning Melville, so this review could get an update in the next couple of years.

What's even more fascinating about Le cercle rouge, and why it takes its place among top tier crime movies, is how Melville lets us examine and judge his characters. We find them to be less than moral, and yet instead of the police they abide by their code of conduct. I wouldn't say that the police are portrayed in a negative light, but rather they are seen as the opposing force set against the band of anti-heroes. If Melvillle could be accused of backing a group with a murder, a burnt out ex-cop turning to crime, and a career thief, and perhaps even painting them as "Cool," then he suffers from the same charges that have been leveled at Woo as well. I don't think they are fair, really, especially considering how these types of movies turn out. The heist scene alone is perfect, combining suspense with a level of timing, yet its barely takes up most of the film and really doesn't have the same level of importance.

Oh and on a further note, I did like how Melville gave the cops pursuing the gang a face with the aging, old detective. Although by now something of a cliche, the dogged policeman endlessly chasing people is something that was still a tad fresh even in the early 1970s. Not sure we needed scenes of him at his home, though-I felt those were the weakest elements in the film.

Nope, instead the group's attempts to constantly avoid capture and to profit from their success usually is the more entertaining, and captivating, part of this film, although that's not true of all heist movies. Yet Melville's sad portrayal of destiny and an inability to escape one's fate in life makes the final act more film noir than gangster movie. Its a quality that he has in his crime films that make them more engaging and real than any average crime drama or movie about criminals. What a welcomed addition to my movie collection, and really a film that I think could be discussed a little bit more.

PS: I've noticed that I like to buy crime movies on Criterion a lot. The genre endlessly fascinates me, and many of the movies they have in the collection are ones I've never even heard of before. Although this review stems from a second viewing-I rented it from my local library before I ended up purchasing it at Barnes and Noble.
Feb 4, 2017 9:47 AM
0 0
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 17007
MadMan
Oh and on a further note, I did like how Melville gave the cops pursuing the gang a face with the aging, old detective. Although by now something of a cliche, the dogged policeman endlessly chasing people is something that was still a tad fresh even in the early 1970s. Not sure we needed scenes of him at his home, though-I felt those were the weakest elements in the film.

Oh man, I loved those scenes. They humanize him in a way that you never see in Hollywood crime dramas.
Feb 4, 2017 8:22 PM
0 0
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 11442
This movie was good and demonstrates that my "heist movies suck" is a rule of thumb and not set in stone.
Mar 17, 2017 5:18 PM
0 0